Outcome of children on the UK national prioritised paediatric registration tier

P69 Table 1Demographic and transplant data for all 14 prioritised patientsPatient/Sex Centre Age at registration (yrs) Primary liver disease Registered prior to Prioritisation Indication of Prioritization LT Waiting time on prioritised tier/Time on list prior to prioritisation 1/M 1 0 CDG Yes Acute decompensation with presence of encephalopathy Yes/LLS 5/27 2/M 2 1 Cryptogenic Cirrhosis Yes CLD with nodular lesions s/o HCC Yes/LLS 16/48 3/F 1 15 AILD Yes Chronic rejection Yes/whole liver 3/4 4/M 2 0 Biliary Atresia Yes PTLD/HAT/Sepsis Yes/LLS 14/71 5/F 2 4 IFALD No Coagulopathy with active bleeding/Renal impairment Yes/LLS 15/820 6/F 2 0 Biliary Atresia Yes Acute decompensation due to portal hypertension Yes/LLS 37/405 7/M 2 10 NSC Yes Decompensated chronic liver disease/Renal impairment Yes/reduced R lobe 4/7 8/M 3 8 PFIC3 Yes Acute decompensation of Chronic liver disease Yes/LLS 6/51 9/F 1 0 Other (Hepatoblastoma) Intestinal Tx prioritized Acute decompensation of Chronic liver disease Yes/LLS 11/ 10/F 2 0 Biliary atresia Yes Decompensated Chronic Liver Disease with Severe Coagulopathy Yes/LLS 10/120 11/M 1 0 Biliary atresia (Hepatoblastoma) Yes Acute decompensation of Chronic liver disease Yes/LLS 9/4 12/F 3 0 Biliary atresia Yes Acute decompensation of Chronic liver disease Yes/LLS 12/323 13/F 1 17 Hepatic Artery thrombosis Yes Hepatic Artery thrombosis Yes/whole liver 2/ 14/F 2 0 Biliary atresia Yes Acute decompensation of Chronic liver disease Suspended 12/65 PFIC3;Progressive Familial Intrahepatic Cholestasis type 3, LT;Liver transplantation, HCC;Hepatocellular Carcinoma NSC;Neonatal Sclerosing Cholangitis, CDG;Congenital Disorder of Glycosylation, AILD;Autoimmune Liver Disease, IFALD;Intestinal Failure Associated Liver Disease,PTLD;Center 1-Kings;Center2-Birmingham;Center3-Leeds.ConclusionThe national paediatric prioritization tier, introduced during the COVID19 pandemic, has been a pivotal initiative for the UK paediatric LT program, showcasing national collaboration. All patients underwent a LT successfully within a short time from prioritization with 100% patient and graft survival. The intention is to maintain this prioritized paediatric tier beyond the pandemic.

Clinical Spectrum of Children with Acute Hepatitis of Unknown Cause.

BACKGROUND: Since January 2022, there has been an increase in reports of cases of acute hepatitis of unknown cause in children. Although cases have been reported across multiple continents, most have been reported in the United Kingdom. Investigations are ongoing to identify the causative agent or agents. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study involving children referred to a single pediatric liver-transplantation center in the United Kingdom between January 1 and April 11, 2022. These children were 10 years of age or younger and had hepatitis that met the case definition of the U.K. Health Security Agency for confirmed acute hepatitis that was not hepatitis A through E and did not have a metabolic, inherited or genetic, congenital, or mechanical cause, in the context of a serum aminotransferase level greater than 500 IU per liter. We reviewed medical records and documented demographic characteristics, clinical features, and results of liver biochemical, serologic, and molecular tests for hepatotropic and other viruses, as well as radiologic and clinical outcomes. The outcomes were classified as an improving condition, liver transplantation, or death. RESULTS: A total of 44 children had hepatitis that met the confirmed case definition, and most were previously healthy. The median age was 4 years (range, 1 to 7). Common presenting features were jaundice (in 93% of the children), vomiting (in 54%), and diarrhea (in 32%). Among the 30 patients who underwent molecular testing for human adenovirus, 27 (90%) were positive. Fulminant liver failure developed in 6 patients (14%), all of whom received a liver transplant. None of the patients died. All the children, including the 6 who received liver transplants, were discharged home. CONCLUSIONS: In this series involving 44 young children with acute hepatitis of uncertain cause, human adenovirus was isolated in most of the children, but its role in the pathogenesis of this illness has not been established.

A coordinated national UK liver transplant program response, prioritizing waitlist recipients with the highest need, provided excellent outcomes during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic.

INTRODUCTION: Healthcare provision has been severely affected by COVID-19, with specific challenges in organ transplantation. Here, we describe the coordinated response to, and outcomes during the first wave, across all UK liver transplant (LT) centers. METHODS: Several policy changes affecting the liver transplant processes were agreed upon. These included donor age restrictions and changes to offering. A "high-urgency" (HU) category was established, prioritizing only those with UKELD > 60, HCC reaching transplant criteria, and others likely to die within 90 days. Outcomes were compared with the same period in 2018 and 2019. RESULTS: The retrieval rate for deceased donor livers (71% vs. 54%; P < .0001) and conversion from offer to completed transplant (63% vs. 48%; P < .0001) was significantly higher. Pediatric LT activity was maintained; there was a significant reduction in adult (42%) and total (36%) LT. Almost all adult LT were super-urgent (n = 15) or HU (n = 133). We successfully prioritized those with highest illness severity with no reduction in 90-day patient (P = .89) or graft survival (P = .98). There was a small (5% compared with 3%; P = .0015) increase in deaths or removals from the waitlist, mainly amongst HU cohort. CONCLUSIONS: We successfully prioritized LT recipients in highest need, maintaining excellent outcomes, and waitlist mortality was only marginally increased.

A coordinated national response maintained a safe and effective UK liver transplant program during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic

P091 Figure 1Number of livers from UK deceased doners offered, retrieved and transplanted, 4 February 2020 to 5 April 2021[Figure omitted. See PDF]DiscussionA sophisticated national response has maintained a safe and effective UK LT program throughout the first year of COVID. We adapted our resources, implementing phased donor restrictions and a new category for recipient prioritisation. Patients benefitted from collaborative working, enabling those in most need to be transferred and transplanted in protected centres. Consequently, we mitigated against a significant fall in LT activity. Our collaborative response serves as an as exemplar for other specialist healthcare services.

COVID-19 in liver transplant candidates: pretransplant and post-transplant outcomes - an ELITA/ELTR multicentre cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: Explore the impact of COVID-19 on patients on the waiting list for liver transplantation (LT) and on their post-LT course. DESIGN: Data from consecutive adult LT candidates with COVID-19 were collected across Europe in a dedicated registry and were analysed. RESULTS: From 21 February to 20 November 2020, 136 adult cases with laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection from 33 centres in 11 European countries were collected, with 113 having COVID-19. Thirty-seven (37/113, 32.7%) patients died after a median of 18 (10-30) days, with respiratory failure being the major cause (33/37, 89.2%). The 60-day mortality risk did not significantly change between first (35.3%, 95% CI 23.9% to 50.0%) and second (26.0%, 95% CI 16.2% to 40.2%) waves. Multivariable Cox regression analysis showed Laboratory Model for End-stage Liver Disease (Lab-MELD) score of ≥15 (Model for End-stage Liver Disease (MELD) score 15-19, HR 5.46, 95% CI 1.81 to 16.50; MELD score≥20, HR 5.24, 95% CI 1.77 to 15.55) and dyspnoea on presentation (HR 3.89, 95% CI 2.02 to 7.51) being the two negative independent factors for mortality. Twenty-six patients underwent an LT after a median time of 78.5 (IQR 44-102) days, and 25 (96%) were alive after a median follow-up of 118 days (IQR 31-170). CONCLUSIONS: Increased mortality in LT candidates with COVID-19 (32.7%), reaching 45% in those with decompensated cirrhosis (DC) and Lab-MELD score of ≥15, was observed, with no significant difference between first and second waves of the pandemic. Respiratory failure was the major cause of death. The dismal prognosis of patients with DC supports the adoption of strict preventative measures and the urgent testing of vaccination efficacy in this population. Prior SARS-CoV-2 symptomatic infection did not affect early post-transplant survival (96%).

O3 The UK paediatric liver transplant programme during the COVID-19 pandemic

IntroductionThe UK has been severely affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. The impact on the adult population has been disproportionately higher when compared to children with consequent challenges to organ donation and liver transplantation (LT). Across the three UK paediatric liver centres there has only been a very small number of patients who tested positive for COVID-19 and all made a speedy and full recovery. We report here the response during the pandemic across the 3 paediatric LT centres.MethodsA series of nationally agreed policy changes affecting the liver procurement, listing and transplant process were agreed during regular meetings with LT centre directors and NHSE. Actions at a local and national level were agreed to protect and maintain the paediatric LT programmes.Data were collected from 27/03/20 until 26/11/20 and compared with same time period for the years 2016–19.ResultsDuring the study period, there was a significant reduction in the adult population in the mean number of weekly liver offers, donors and LTs compared to before the pandemic with signs of recovery between the 1st and 2nd UK lockdown periods (figure 1). More specifically the number of livers offered nationally was reduced from an average 30–40/week to only <10/week during the 1st wave in the March-April period. The number of children on the LT list during the study period across all 3 centres was 74 in total with 17 (23%) super-urgent and 57(77%) electives, which was comparable to previous years.Overall, 65–80 paediatric LTs are performed annually across the UK’s 3 paediatric centres. From March-November 2020 there were 58(82%) elective and 13(18%) super urgent (acute liver failure & hepatoblastoma) paediatric LTs performed.Donor Brain Dead (DBD) and Donor Cardiac Dead (DCDC) LTs were 54(76%) and 3(4%), respectively. Living related LT (LRLT) programme was sustained comprising 20% of LTs performed.The number of paediatric LTs performed during the pandemic was comparable to those performed yearly since 2016. The number of LT per paediatric centre for King’s College Hospital (KCH), Birmingham Children’s Hospital (BCH) and Leeds Liver Unit were 40 (56%), 15(21%) and 16(23%), respectively with excellent outcome. A 15-year-old girl from KCH diagnosed with Wilson disease presented with liver failure and became COVID-19 positive whilst listed. She underwent LT soon after becoming COVID-19 negative. No perioperative mortality was reported with excellent outcome so far in all.ConclusionThe current COVID-19 pandemic had a significant impact on the UK adult LT programme. The paediatric programme LT was preserved despite a decrease in organ offering and retrieval nationally plus limitations on adult intensive care resources at a regional level. Overall, paediatric LT outcome remained very good.

An international multicenter study of protocols for liver transplantation during a pandemic: A case for quadripartite equipoise.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: The outbreak of COVID-19 has vastly increased the operational burden on healthcare systems worldwide. For patients with end-stage liver failure, liver transplantation is the only option. However, the strain on intensive care facilities caused by the pandemic is a major concern. There is an urgent need for ethical frameworks to balance the need for liver transplantation against the availability of national resources. METHODS: We performed an international multicenter study of transplant centers to understand the evolution of policies for transplant prioritization in response to the pandemic in March 2020. To describe the ethical tension arising in this setting, we propose a novel ethical framework, the quadripartite equipoise (QE) score, that is applicable to liver transplantation in the context of limited national resources. RESULTS: Seventeen large- and medium-sized liver transplant centers from 12 countries across 4 continents participated. Ten centers opted to limit transplant activity in response to the pandemic, favoring a "sickest-first" approach. Conversely, some larger centers opted to continue routine transplant activity in order to balance waiting list mortality. To model these and other ethical tensions, we computed a QE score using 4 factors - recipient outcome, donor/graft safety, waiting list mortality and healthcare resources - for 7 countries. The fluctuation of the QE score over time accurately reflects the dynamic changes in the ethical tensions surrounding transplant activity in a pandemic. CONCLUSIONS: This four-dimensional model of quadripartite equipoise addresses the ethical tensions in the current pandemic. It serves as a universally applicable framework to guide regulation of transplant activity in response to the increasing burden on healthcare systems. LAY SUMMARY: There is an urgent need for ethical frameworks to balance the need for liver transplantation against the availability of national resources during the COVID-19 pandemic. We describe a four-dimensional model of quadripartite equipoise that models these ethical tensions and can guide the regulation of transplant activity in response to the increasing burden on healthcare systems.